# Spreading Activation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-WLY8U2gHw
Translation: zh-TW

[00:01] It's a bit of a rainy day and I hope the sound doesn't, um, affect the videos so much.
  今天有點下雨，我希望聲音不會太影響影片。

[00:09] Today I want to talk about the nature of the mind that hosts very microscopic, invisible connections, um.
  今天我想談談心靈的本質，它承載著非常微小、看不見的連結。

[00:25] How is everything connected?
  萬物是如何連結的？

[00:28] So we like to say that like there's coincidences and synchronicities, um.
  所以我們喜歡說，有所謂的巧合和同步性。

[00:36] And yet how so when people's bodies move in the inner dance, a lot of those connections are actually happening.
  然而，當人們的身體在內在舞蹈中移動時，許多這些連結實際上正在發生。

[00:44] I want to look at the nature of that which is explored in the cognitive sciences as networks, you know, like within us there's like a universe.
  我想探討那個本質，它在認知科學中被探索為網絡，你知道，就像我們體內有一個宇宙。

[01:02] Or an internet of data.
  或者一個數據的網際網路。

[01:05] And there could be three different types, actually.
  而且實際上可能有三種不同的類型。

[01:09] Um, you can have an awareness of your iconic network.
  嗯，你可以對你的圖像網絡有意識。

[01:17] And so this might be all the images you've ever seen.
  所以這可能是你曾經看過的所有圖像。

[01:22] How are they stored inside your body?
  它們是如何儲存在你的身體裡？

[01:26] So let's say there's the image of a house, for example.
  所以舉例來說，假設有一間房子的圖像。

[01:29] That might be linked with, um, certain things in the house.
  那可能與房子裡的某些東西有關聯。

[01:36] It could be something that looks like this.
  它可能是看起來像這樣的東西。

[01:44] Not just that, you also have other networks.
  不僅如此，你還有其他網絡。

[01:51] Let me just share three of them today.
  今天讓我分享其中三個。

[01:57] Now, when you look at the semantic network, what you're really regarding would be...
  現在，當你看著語義網絡時，你真正關注的會是……

[02:05] The nature of meaning as it's normally encased in concepts or words.
  意義的本質，通常被包裹在概念或詞語中。

[02:14] So instead of this, maybe what you would have is this and that would interrelate with that, and then would have that, and it could just keep going.
  所以與其這樣，也許你會擁有的是這個，而這個會與那個相互關聯，然後又會產生那個，而且它可以一直持續下去。

[02:30] This could be anything that you can think about.
  這可以是你能想到的任何事物。

[02:33] You could draw a picture of a baby, which would connect to mother, milk, diapers, like poop, innocence, purity, and so on and so forth.
  你可以畫一張嬰兒的圖畫，它會連接到母親、牛奶、尿布，比如大便、天真、純潔，等等等等。

[02:45] So in a way, this is what our minds look like.
  所以從某種意義上說，這就是我們心智的模樣。

[02:48] I can't really draw this for you, because it exists within sound echoic network.
  我無法真正為你畫出這個，因為它存在於聲音回聲網絡中。

[02:58] Organizes all the possible frequencies and vibrations you've ever heard within your body.
  它組織了你身體內曾聽過的所有可能的頻率和振動。

[03:02] This would look...
  這看起來會……

[03:06] More like an orchestra symphony or a song that makes you audibly you.
  更像是交響樂團、交響曲或一首歌，讓你聽起來像你自己。

[03:19] So, um, holding this in place, we start to understand that the nature of the inner dance is, in fact, the mind's ability to move across, um, this universe, you know.
  所以，嗯，把這個固定住，我們開始理解內在舞蹈的本質，其實是心靈穿越這個宇宙的能力，你知道的。

[03:32] Maybe, uh, you can dance through there and, and somehow the sacred movement is able to create new bindings, new wirings, um, new connections that might not have been so prominent before.
  也許，呃，你可以從那裡舞動過去，然後不知何故，神聖的動作能夠創造新的連結、新的線路、嗯，新的連接，這些以前可能不那麼突出。

[03:48] Um, so when you start to visit energy, this, this actually is happening like so deeply, and the more we look at it, the more possible understanding might come.
  嗯，所以當你開始接觸能量時，這實際上正在如此深刻地發生，而我們越觀察它，就越可能獲得理解。

[04:01] For now, I want to bring up a very important concept that, um, differentiates.
  現在，我想提出一個非常重要的概念，嗯，它有所區別。

[04:09] Two different ways in which we can experience the network now.
  我們現在可以體驗網路的兩種不同方式。

[04:18] One word people in energy process tend to use a lot is activation, right?
  能量處理領域的人們經常使用的一個詞是「激活」，對吧？

[04:23] So what does it really mean to activate?
  那麼，激活的真正含義是什麼？

[04:26] There are two ways of doing that really.
  實際上，有兩種方法可以做到這一點。

[04:35] The first being a direct priming experience.
  第一種是直接啟動體驗。

[04:44] And within that model, a high latent inhibition is happening.
  在該模型中，存在高度的潛在抑制。

[04:53] Don't be scared of the term; we'll cover what it means.
  別被這個術語嚇到；我們會解釋它的含義。

[05:00] So direct priming describes a more linear way in which the mind explores connections.
  因此，直接啟動描述了一種更線性的方式，心靈藉此探索連結。

[05:09] Let's say this is number one.
  假設這是第一項。

[05:10] This would be number two.
  這會是第二項。

[05:12] It makes choices. Oh, let's go here. Number three.
  它做出選擇。哦，我們來這裡。第三項。

[05:14] Number four.
  第四項。

[05:15] Number five, um, and so on and so forth.
  第五項，嗯，諸如此類。

[05:20] Um, this is not what's happening in the inner dance.
  嗯，這並非內在舞蹈中發生的情況。

[05:24] In the inner dance, um, what is called a hyper priming is at work.
  在內在舞蹈中，嗯，所謂的超級啟動正在運作。

[05:35] Oh, sorry.
  哦，抱歉。

[05:37] Hard to concentrate when you're doing video and drawing at the same time.
  同時進行影片和繪畫時很難集中注意力。

[05:40] A hyper priming could be modeled within an omnidirectional way in which information is so much more diversely spread out.
  超級啟動可以用一種全方位的方式來建模，在這種方式中，資訊被更加多樣地分散開來。

[05:56] So you can imagine the brain of a baby or even an animal.
  所以你可以想像一個嬰兒甚至動物的腦袋。

[06:03] Um, they actually have so much more connections that we do.
  嗯，它們實際上比我們擁有更多的連結。

[06:07] Because the more you know, the less you...
  因為你知道得越多，你就越少……

[06:10] Do the more you learn concepts, the more you learn images, the more you undergo certain patterns.
  你越是學習概念，越是學習圖像，就越會經歷某些模式。

[06:20] You actually have to remove, you know, like a lot of the connections.
  你實際上必須移除，你知道的，很多連接。

[06:25] You prune synaptic connections.
  你修剪突觸連接。

[06:30] You prune neurological wiring, neuronal connections.
  你修剪神經線路、神經元連接。

[06:37] So what you end up is this.
  所以你最終得到的是這個。

[06:40] So let's say you have a chance to move from here back to here.
  所以假設你有機會從這裡移動回這裡。

[06:46] What you would then experience is a low latent inhibition.
  你接著會體驗到的是一種低潛伏抑制。

[06:59] And how this works in the inner dance process is about the rerouting of certain neural transmitters that normally organize, like we talked about.
  而這在內在舞蹈過程中如何運作，是關於重新路由某些通常會組織起來的神經傳導物質，就像我們討論過的。

[07:11] Motor functions and emotions, attentions, memory — that what we remember is what we know through Hebbian learning.
  運動功能與情緒、注意力、記憶——我們記住的是我們透過赫布學習所知道的。

[07:20] When neurons fire together, then they wire together.
  當神經元同時激發，它們就會連結在一起。

[07:24] So when we start to form certain habits, um, we basically prune away existing connections.
  所以當我們開始形成某些習慣時，嗯，我們基本上會修剪掉現有的連結。

[07:33] So that we tend to limit our mental capacities when we come into culture, when we come into language, when we come into logic systems.
  因此，當我們進入文化、語言和邏輯系統時，我們往往會限制自己的心智能力。

[07:46] Okay, so um, given this, I want to go into what is paradigmatic meaning.
  好的，那麼嗯，鑑於此，我想探討什麼是典範意義。

[07:56] Because when you go into the process of um going back to the origins of interconnectedness, going back to the mind of the baby, um we...
  因為當你進入嗯回到相互連結的源頭、回到嬰兒心智的過程時，嗯我們……

[08:12] Tend to see a lot of things we send.
  傾向於看到我們發送的許多事物。

[08:14] We tend to experience and sense, um, many connections that we didn't see before.
  我們傾向於體驗和感知，嗯，許多我們之前沒看到的聯繫。

[08:21] So for example, a house could lead to the image of a dragon.
  所以例如，一棟房子可能導向一條龍的圖像。

[08:26] And then suddenly you see a rainbow.
  然後突然你看到一道彩虹。

[08:29] [Music]
  [音樂]

[08:30] Things that don't seem to connect insanely creatively, like some inner artistry, start to interlink with each other, you know?
  那些看似不瘋狂地創造性地連接的事物，像某種內在藝術性，開始彼此連結，你知道嗎？

[08:41] Like tree and maybe that would be money and communism and, like, um, uh, you know, like an airplane or that.
  比如樹，也許那會是金錢和共產主義，還有，嗯，呃，你知道，像一架飛機或那樣。

[08:52] It's like this weird amazing craziness we find so present in the dream state.
  這就像我們在夢境中發現的這種奇怪而驚人的瘋狂。

[09:01] When entered, an inner dance starts to happen.
  當進入時，一場內在舞蹈開始發生。

[09:04] The very physical movement is, in fact, the allowance of hidden or inhibited connections to come.
  這種非常物理的運動，實際上是允許隱藏或受抑制的聯繫出現。

[09:12] Come alive, which is a spreading of activation that moves from here to here.
  活躍起來，這是一種從這裡移動到那裡的激活擴散。

[09:20] So I want to bring up one example that I brought up in an audio that might be useful in allowing these to become practical to us.
  所以我想提出一個我在音頻中提到的例子，這可能對讓這些變得實用有所幫助。

[09:36] Let's hit two birds with one, uh, not a stone; um, what can we hit a bird with? Um, like sunflower seeds.
  讓我們一舉兩得，呃，不是用石頭；嗯，我們能用什麼打鳥？嗯，像葵花籽。

[09:46] Let's hit one bird with a thousand flowers, sunflower seeds; they might like that.
  讓我們用千朵花、葵花籽打一隻鳥；牠們可能會喜歡。

[09:53] So we speak about transmission because it's often used just like the word activation.
  所以我們談論傳播，因為它經常像「激活」這個詞一樣被使用。

[09:57] Um, want to look at this because every time you use a word, you create a cascade of, um, other conceptual domains.
  嗯，想看看這個，因為每次你使用一個詞，你就會創造出一連串，嗯，其他概念領域。

[10:16] That hold that reality in place transmission as it is normally used regards the transportation of something, usually it's um energy, it's electricity, a transmission of information.
  那個將現實固定住的傳輸，如其通常用法，涉及某物的運輸，通常是能量、電力、資訊的傳輸。

[10:41] And we are shifting our understandings of what is being transmitted as we are innovating new forms of media, new forms of information.
  而我們正在轉變對被傳輸內容的理解，因為我們正在創新新的媒體形式、新的資訊形式。

[10:55] Most likely transmission follows through with communication as a conceptual domain.
  很可能傳輸隨著溝通作為一個概念領域而貫徹。

[11:06] I think this is what's more um important to look at, like what is the cascade within communication itself that...
  我認為這才是更重要的觀察點，像是溝通本身內部的串聯是什麼……

[11:19] Um creates a basis for which a lot of people use the word transmission.
  嗯，這為許多人使用「傳播」一詞奠定了基礎。

[11:31] So when you think of communication, normally you need to have a sender.
  所以當你想到溝通時，通常你需要有一個發送者。

[11:38] This is maybe an older definition of communication anyhow.
  這無論如何可能是溝通的一個較舊的定義。

[11:43] You need to have someone to receive what is being transmitted.
  你需要有人接收正在傳輸的內容。

[11:49] Paradigmatically, you also need like a message.
  典型地，你還需要一個訊息。

[11:55] And um, you also need some kind of medium, you know, because messages aren't transmitted through a vacuum.
  而且嗯，你還需要某種媒介，你知道，因為訊息不是透過真空傳輸的。

[12:06] So traditionally, this um can be seen within um the communications model.
  所以傳統上，這嗯可以在溝通模型中看到。

[12:16] Let's look at the most common one that's.
  讓我們來看看最常見的那個。

[12:19] Been used.
  已被使用。

[12:22] In theory, um, we can look at it from Jakobsonian modeling later on, but for now let's maybe simplify things.
  理論上，嗯，我們可以稍後從雅各布森模型的角度來看待它，但現在我們先簡化一下。

[12:36] Um, to just, uh, look at things in general.
  嗯，就，呃，大致上看看事情。

[12:46] So for a communication or a transmission to happen, there has to be a clear sense of someone sending something out.
  所以，要發生溝通或傳輸，必須清楚有人發送某樣東西。

[13:00] There has to be a content.
  必須有內容。

[13:03] There has to be a channel that mediates the message.
  必須有一個中介訊息的通道。

[13:07] And there has to be someone receiving it.
  而且必須有人接收它。

[13:16] Um, now when you look at these four...
  嗯，現在當你看著這四個……

[13:20] Elements um when you look at these four elements you will notice that there are different possible interpretations of what might seem obvious.
  元素，嗯，當你觀察這四個元素時，你會注意到對於看似明顯的事物，可能存在不同的解讀。

[13:36] It might be simple, especially maybe when you look at which network are you dominantly using, you know what are you dependent on.
  這可能很簡單，尤其是當你檢視自己主要使用哪個網絡時，你知道自己依賴什麼。

[13:52] A lot of people can be very visual in their spiritual experience or in their realities, you know.
  很多人可能在他們的靈性體驗或現實中非常視覺化，你知道的。

[13:59] A lot of people work more with images as opposed to certain people who work more with meanings.
  很多人更傾向於使用圖像，而有些人則更注重意義。

[14:07] Some people experience sounds, their sensitivities are heightened more with vibrations, much more than images.
  有些人體驗聲音，他們的敏感度因振動而增強，遠超過圖像。

[14:16] So um you would notice sometimes in the work that we do a lot of people.
  所以，嗯，你會注意到在我們的工作中，有時候很多人……

[14:20] Actually have to close their eyes when they're listening to people in order to receive the meaning.
  實際上必須閉上眼睛，當他們在聽別人說話時，才能接收意義。

[14:27] Semantics, um, in many ways defines, uh, words.
  語義學，嗯，在很多方面定義了，呃，詞語。

[14:35] Words hold semantics — sorry, this is a little bit okay — unless you read that a word in Cesarean linguistics is, in fact, the combination of the sound and the image.
  詞語承載語義——抱歉，這有點不太對——除非你讀到，在凱撒語言學中，一個詞語實際上是聲音和圖像的結合。

[14:53] And when you go into energy process, sometimes sound could be more prominent, sometimes image is more prominent.
  而當你進入能量過程時，有時聲音會更突出，有時圖像會更突出。

[15:00] And very often it's actually a translation between both.
  而且通常它實際上是兩者之間的轉換。

[15:04] Using music as a tool, people start to see images.
  使用音樂作為工具，人們開始看到圖像。

[15:11] And what we're, what we're doing is we're going into a deeper dimensionality that normally operates on semanticity or speech or linear language.
  而我們正在做的，是進入一個更深層次的維度，這個維度通常運作於語義性、言語或線性語言之上。

[15:24] So when you look at this and we try to understand the differentiations between, um, let's say a time in our evolutions when we were more dependent on sound.
  所以當你看著這個，我們試著理解其中的差異，比如說在我們演化中更依賴聲音的時期。

[15:39] As opposed to the evolutions into modernity when we start to use images a lot more, um, the communication model could look very, very different.
  相對於進入現代性的演化，當我們開始更大量使用圖像時，溝通模式可能會看起來非常非常不同。

[15:53] Depending on when was the communication happening or what medium are we using to hold a transmission, yeah.
  取決於溝通發生的時間，或者我們使用什麼媒介來承載傳輸，是的。

[16:04] So in the age of oral traditions, when we were relying on the spoken word to send forth like what we wanted to convey, we were reliant more in the right brain.
  所以在口述傳統的時代，當我們依賴口語來傳達我們想表達的內容時，我們更依賴右腦。

[16:19] And communication systems were more, um, more two-way.
  而溝通系統更，嗯，更雙向。

[16:28] So um there was uh a less clear distinction between the energy of the sender and the energy of the receiver.
  所以，嗯，呃，發送者的能量與接收者的能量之間區別較不明顯。

[16:47] So that a sender might send a message through a medium, a receiver would receive it.
  因此，發送者可能透過媒介傳送訊息，接收者則會接收它。

[16:58] And then um the receiver would then take his or her turn to become the sender.
  然後，嗯，接收者會輪到自己成為發送者。

[17:06] You know they would they would retort, they would reply their own messages using the same medium, usually, to establish a feedback.
  你知道，他們會反駁，他們會使用相同的媒介回覆自己的訊息，通常是為了建立回饋。

[17:17] So what took place was when we invented technologies that would allow us to move from sound um to to the image.
  所以，發生的事情是，當我們發明了讓我們從聲音，嗯，轉移到圖像的技術時。

[17:30] Um, we we reinvented the brain.
  嗯，我們重新發明了大腦。

[17:34] We we moved from the right brain to the left brain for one.
  我們從右腦轉移到左腦，這是其一。

[17:39] And uh we moved from subjectivity to objectivity.
  而且，呃，我們從主觀轉向客觀。

[17:43] We were able to store information on mediums just like this one, you know.
  我們能夠將資訊儲存在像這樣的媒介上，你知道的。

[17:49] Like um I I can I can store this in a way that sound cannot.
  就像，嗯，我可以以聲音無法做到的方式儲存這個。

[17:54] As soon as I speak it, it's already gone.
  我一說出口，它就已經消失了。

[17:58] Um, in tribal times anyway, before we created recording companies and these amazing audio devices that can store our the soul of our sound.
  嗯，在部落時代，無論如何，在我們創立唱片公司和這些能儲存我們聲音靈魂的驚人音訊設備之前。

[18:09] In the age of literacy, we we were able to store what used to be so so temporal.
  在識字時代，我們能夠儲存那些曾經如此短暫的東西。

[18:19] And what that did, especially in the age of the book, what that did was um it it it took this away.
  而這帶來的影響，尤其是在書籍時代，這帶來的影響是，嗯，它把這個帶走了。

[18:31] Momentarily it took this away.
  瞬間它把這個帶走了。

[18:35] Um, so.
  嗯，所以。

[18:38] So yeah, let's destroy this um.
  所以對，我們來摧毀這個嗯。

[18:45] When you write a book, you can't speak.
  當你寫一本書時，你不能說話。

[18:52] When you write a book, here's the message.
  當你寫一本書時，這是訊息。

[18:54] And then here's the it's the book on paper and it's um hard version.
  然後這是它，是紙上的書，而且是嗯硬版本。

[18:59] When a receiver reads the book, you can't really talk to the book.
  當接收者閱讀這本書時，你無法真正與書對話。

[19:07] The book will talk to you.
  書會對你說話。

[19:08] But you can't um you can't experience some kind of authorship.
  但你不能嗯，你無法體驗某種作者身份。

[19:19] You can't establish some kind of authorship that is primarily given to the one who holds the pen.
  你無法建立某種主要歸屬於握筆者的作者身份。

[19:28] The one who holds the the the power to.
  那個握有權力的人。

[19:32] Write the story down.
  把這個故事寫下來。

[19:34] And authorship in many ways holds a lot of power, a lot of authority.
  而作者身份在很多方面擁有很大的權力和權威。

[19:41] So, um, since we are so much coming from a highly Newtonian three-dimensional paradigm, even though we're learning all of these energy-based tools, um, Newtonian science, Newtonian reality is simply still based on three-dimensional thought, um.
  所以，嗯，因為我們很大程度上來自一個高度牛頓式的三維範式，即使我們正在學習所有這些基於能量的工具，嗯，牛頓科學、牛頓現實仍然只是基於三維思維，嗯。

[20:07] And literacy had a huge hand in establishing power structures, um.
  而讀寫能力在建立權力結構中扮演了重要角色，嗯。

[20:15] It's ironic because it was in orality, it was in the age of orality when religious traditions were more dominant, so that through the mediation of the priest and the Bible, the, the, the one true sender.
  這很諷刺，因為正是在口語時代，在口語時代，宗教傳統更為盛行，因此透過牧師和聖經的中介，那個、那個、那個唯一的真神。

[20:35] originally was god so there was

[20:38] always this clear awareness

[20:42] that those who

[20:45] receive that message aren't

[20:48] basically the source

[20:53] and and i think this is what our work

[20:57] in energy explorations is trying to

[21:01] to heal so eventually we

[21:04] discovered electricity

[21:08] and technological innovations that

[21:12] allowed us to move

[21:13] from book based

[21:16] mediums to electronic

[21:22] mediums so transmission at that point

[21:27] um what was interesting

[21:30] borrowing a lot of the

[21:35] mechanisms that are involved in literacy

[21:39] even as we're beginning to experience

[21:42] possible feedback loops that orality

[21:46] held because television

[21:49] and radio were still mass media

[21:52] based in the early usage of that those

[21:56] who

[21:56] held their resources held the

[21:58] information

[21:59] still pretty much also held

[22:02] authorship and so it was really maybe

[22:06] only when we um

[22:10] innovative the internet that

[22:15] um we could bring this back

[22:18] um suddenly um

[22:24] there could once again be

[22:28] through media and spiritual process

[22:32] a bi-directionality you know an

[22:34] omnidirectionality

[22:36] that allows receivers once again to

[22:39] become senders

[22:40] you know just like um when you when you

[22:44] have these cell phones the like of which

[22:47] i'm using now

[22:48] i don't have to be steven spielberg to

[22:50] make a movie

[22:51] all i need is to sit down with these

[22:54] materials that i have before me and

[22:56] upload these onto youtube and suddenly i

[22:58] can become like a filmmaker

[23:01] um so

[23:04] this is important to understand because

[23:09] transmission has been moving away from a

[23:11] newtonian

[23:13] model to maybe a more quantum

[23:19] cosmological model

[23:25] which means that

[23:28] even these are becoming very very

[23:30] unclear in the past when

[23:34] technologies were quite basic especially

[23:37] still through here

[23:39] um senders were very singular messages

[23:42] were simple

[23:43] mediums were few and receivers were very

[23:46] conventional

[23:47] it is very easy to create

[23:52] common messages that would um

[23:55] be received in great popularity you know

[23:58] you could create revolutions you could

[24:00] stagnate societies just by

[24:04] utilizing and sustaining

[24:07] messages and mediums that

[24:10] [Music]

[24:11] those who had this could

[24:15] rely on right now through through these

[24:19] um there is a poly vocality

[24:22] meaning whenever something is sent out

[24:25] the actual

[24:26] sender is the context the sender

[24:30] lives in it's it's like the entire

[24:31] culture being channeled by the center

[24:34] is now uh being sent out in poly

[24:37] semanticity meaning each message now has

[24:40] so many meanings because

[24:42] the languages of the world the cultures

[24:44] of the world are interlocking with each

[24:45] other

[24:46] there's so many types of media as well

[24:49] taking place

[24:50] now holding all these messages

[24:52] transmitting all these messages

[24:54] and there's also a poly

[24:58] receptivity um

[25:00] [Music]

[25:06] audiences are changing their minds every

[25:08] day because they're so

[25:09] influenced by the bully localities of

[25:12] the multiple senders

[25:14] when you open let's say social media

[25:16] accounts there's this news feed

[25:18] where temporal messages are

[25:22] streaming through being consumed by

[25:25] by everyone in some kind of network of

[25:28] of everything everyone every place

[25:31] every time so um

[25:35] what the internet has been doing

[25:40] uh it

[25:43] has been to to bring us back to tribal

[25:46] minds

[25:46] tribal experiences were reactivating the

[25:49] right brain

[25:50] that had become very recessive

[25:54] because of the dominance of the left

[25:56] brain

[25:57] and to describe this event

[26:00] through the thoughts of walter ong a

[26:04] student of

[26:05] marcia mcluhan who was the media

[26:09] theorist of the age

[26:11] a secondary orality is happening we're

[26:14] retaining a lot of the mechanisms that

[26:16] we have gained through literacy

[26:19] you know which makes us intelligent as

[26:21] we kind of are now

[26:23] but for some reason we're having to go

[26:25] back to a tribal mind

[26:28] where feedback systems were a lot more

[26:31] circular and not so one way

[26:37] um so i feel maybe these are important

[26:40] for us to regard

[26:41] because the the inner dance is

[26:45] creating a bridge between like

[26:48] two types of thinking and very often the

[26:51] inner dance becomes a mere tool

[26:54] um that exists very much still within

[26:58] a very very old paradigm um

[27:01] if the inner dance is to achieve a

[27:03] certain level of success

[27:06] i think it cannot stay merely as a tool

[27:09] but that this

[27:10] is the paradigm

[27:13] so so we're experiencing a new brain a

[27:15] new mind a new

[27:19] um universe of information

[27:22] and the more we understand

[27:26] what it is we are um

[27:29] moving through i think we can develop

[27:33] a lot more amazing

[27:36] possible explorations of this that

[27:39] experiences music experiences the

[27:42] movement

[27:43] experiences the like language

[27:47] in highly informed ways

[27:51] receivers must receive

[27:55] power

[27:59] because we're healing that system that

[28:02] establishes that the sender

[28:04] is the one that holds it

[28:08] so at this point when you experience

[28:10] energy it's not actually clear

[28:13] who is sending you know because

[28:15] everything just becomes

[28:16] one the universe is sending itself as a

[28:20] message

[28:21] coursing through its itself as a medium

[28:24] so that the universe can receive itself

[28:26] as a conversation with the one

[28:29] so i want to thank this and i want to i

[28:31] want to thank all the spiritual

[28:33] technologies this mirroring

[28:36] uh how we're beginning to understand

[28:39] uh who we truly are so thank you for

[28:41] listening and looking forward to the

[28:42] next video

[28:44] bye
